Friday, November 20, 2009

"For the Children"

The rallying cry for the very most liberal causes of the past 20 years has been, "It's for the children."

Well, now it is. The $1.5 trillion tab for nationalization of the health care insurance industry is to be placed on the backs of the children.

As Ramesh Ponnuru put it so well in NRO

In the primaries, Obama distinguished himself from Clinton on health care by opposing an individual mandate. In the general election, he distinguished himself from McCain by opposing taxes on health benefits. So now he is trying to pass bills with both an individual mandate and taxes on health benefits — and his supporters are saying that Congress should go along because he won the election.
Politics has become a shell game, a con game soaking life from present and future generations.


Name one mandate that hasn't grown, one rule from Washington that hasn't become tighter.

Continued......

Saturday, November 14, 2009

Purple Hearts or "Get Well Soon" Cards?

For the dead at Fort Hood, killed by a jihadist agent in time of war, their lives fully spent, military honors are all that remain.
Will they and their wounded comrades receive those honors or will they suffer one more sacrifice, one more indignity in the name of political correctness?

Each of them deserves the Purple Heart, which is usually awarded nearly immediately after suffering a combat wound.

We'll learn much about the Army, the Department of Defense and the administration in this time of Obama by how long it takes to award the medals.


My own betting is that it will take some future President to correct the wrong done by this President, in this matter as well as so many others.

Continued......

Another Obama Apology?

Glenn Reynolds points out over at Instapundit that two Japanese submarines were discovered on the ocean bottom outside Pearl Harbor, presumably sunk by the U. S. Navy on their way to attack either Pearl or Honolulu during WWII.

I wonder if this had anything to do with President Obama's deep bow to the Emperor, an apology for that war-like act on our part?


If I ever need the "world's most obsequious apology", I'm gonna call Obama. The man's good.

Continued......

Jurors Sentenced to Life Without Parole

Do you suppose President Obama gave a moment's thought to the future jury that will sit for the trial of the terrorist war criminals in New York City? If the jurists eventually vote to convict, won't they likely be targets of real and wannabe jihadists for the rest of their lives?

They will spend every waking moment of every waking day wondering whether the car will start with a flash, whether the loud bang was a backfire or a rifle shot, whether the sudden pain while strolling down Fifth Avenue is a knife in the side.

Their spouses, children, parents, siblings, workplaces, churches and bowling alleys will be at risk for a generation.

They will be pariahs among their friends, worse than Typhoid Mary. Like her, they may be imprisoned for life for their own protection on an island in NYC's harbor.

A possible silver lining: Mayor Bloomberg is about to get a ton of requests for concealed weapons permits from ordinary everyday citizens of New York, members of the jury pool. It'll be interesting to see how he responds.


These guys, reputed to be so very smart, really aren't impressive at all.

Continued......

From Superpower to Superbower

If there's one thing community activists have to know how to do well, that's to be obsequious in the pursuit of their activism.


President Obama was one heck of a community activist.


At least he's not on bended knee this time.

Continued......

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

"Nuts" to nuts

The debate currently consuming way too much attention is the question whether Nidal Hasan, the Ft. Hood killer, is unbalanced. National Public Radio is reporting that officials at Walter Reed and USUHS, Hasan's school, debated for nearly a year whether Hasan was psychotic.

Past the immediate response of who cares lies a more troublesome thought: Wouldn't these folks diagnose any jihadist as psychotic? I mean, what else do you call men who deliberately impose terror on others for the very sake of terror? What do you call men who strap bombs on other men, on drugged women and mentally challenged children? Men who fly planeloads of civilians into buildings inhabited only by other civilians?

Jeez, by our standards they're all irrational.

They're all psychotic.

Heck, they're all nuts, but that doesn't mean we should suggest an hour a week of therapy while they seek a cure. It's more appropriate to think in terms of a rabid attacker about to bite.

Cure the immediate problem and let God do the deeper diagnosis.

We're at war and it's reached our homeland.

Continued......

Historical Juxtaposition? Dr. Hasan and the House

Entire schools of philosophy are devoted to the question of coincidence. Does it exist or not?

This week's strangest timing was the mass killing by a government doctor, a psychiatrist no less, of prospective patients at Ft. Hood the day before passage by the House of Representatives of a 2,000 page bill nationalizing the health care industry.

Historians of the future will note and wonder.

Of course, by then Obamacare will have killed far more Americans than the despicable Ft. Hood jihadist.

We are at war, but feign peace. We are broke, but feign wealth.

Continued......

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

A Lesson Unlearned: From Luby's Cafeteria to Fort Hood

Eighteen years and two weeks ago, tragedy struck Killeen, Texas as a single vengeful killer armed with two pistols murdered 23 people and wounded 20 more customers eating lunch in Luby's Cafeteria. Last week, a different single vengeful killer armed with two pistols murdered one civilian and 12 soldiers and wounded 30 more at neighboring Ft. Hood, less than eight miles up U. S. Highway 190 from the old Luby's site.

While the two killers had nothing in common other than hatred for America, the victims shared sad similarities: victims of terrorists and victims of the law. The loss of life, the tragic losses suffered by their families, the life changing wounds of those whose lives were made worse, much worse, by laws that forced them into harm's way.

Among the dead at Luby's that day were Al and Ursula Gratia. Their daughter, Dr. Suzanna Hupp, was with them when the restaurant was attacked while they were eating. But for a Texas law that required that she leave her personal pistol outside in her car, that forbade her from carrying it into the restaurant, Dr. Hupp would have had the ability to defend her parents, herself and the others from the erratic but deadly attack by George Hennard in the second-worst shooting rampage in American history.

Dr. Hupp, reacting instinctively to the first shots, reached into her purse for her pistol.

It was not there.

Complying with Texas law of the time, she had locked her pistol in her truck parked outside. She watched in shock as her father attempted to subdue the shooter and was shot dead. She watched as Hennard repeatedly reloaded his pistols and resumed shooting. She watched as her mother, comforting her dying father, was killed.

Dr. Hupp escaped death that day and vowed to make a difference, promising herself to never again be a victim of senseless slaughter. A year later, she led the effort to change Texas law so that today more than 200,000 law-abiding Texans can protect themselves and others by lawfully carrying concealed pistols. There have been no mass shootings in Texas since… until last week.

On Thursday, Dr. Nidal Malik Hasan walked into a processing center in the middle of Ft. Hood, and opened fire against its 300 occupants with one of his two pistols, stopping to reload at least five times. Forty-two of his targets were soldiers, each of them trained with firearms. Of his 300 potential victims, dozens were experts with rifle or pistol, but in accordance with current law none of the 300 were allowed access to weapons on base, not the military weapons with which they'd soon be deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan nor their personal guns. Though knowledgeable, skilled and responsible, they were made defenseless by the law. While their leaders trust these men and women to wander the world with weapons that can level a building, they don't trust them with a handgun at home.

Interestingly, the first responder at Fort Hood was a woman armed with a pistol. Civilian police officer Kimberly Munley, who just last month finished an 80-hour course certifying her as a firearm instructor for her agency, was directing traffic when the call to respond came, "shots fired." She followed a strategy developed after the Virgina Tech shootings, another mass shooting in a state sponsored "gun free zone." Rather than waiting for backup or overwhelming responding force, Officer Munley rushed with her partner to the sound of guns. Within seconds of arrival, she shot the killer four times and stopped the death clock.

Ron Borsch, police trainer at the SEALE Regional Training Academy in Bedford, Ohio is an especially vocal proponent of training for active shooter incidents. He stresses the training that Officer Munley followed so well: get in the fight, don't wait; locate and immobilize the shooter; seconds count to save lives. This new strategy is replacing the old mindset to contain the problem while waiting for SWAT to actually take action, a disaster at Columbine, a disaster at the Amish school in Pennsylvania, a disaster at Virginia Tech.

Missed by the press, ignored by politicians, mass shootings now take place almost exclusively in "gun-free zones", areas where law abiding citizens are disarmed by force of law. The crazies have proven to be remarkably adept at attacking these soft spots. They've proven equally adept at collapsing at the very first armed resistance.

It's time we follow the Israeli model, proven effective in a nation also at war against enemies that strive for terror. Like Israel, let's arm our military, whether on base or off, on duty or not. Let's enable them to protect themselves against the further attacks which are certain to come. Let's empower them to help defend the rest of us.

Let's recognize the truth that Ron Borsch teaches: seconds count and only an immediate response will stop the death clock. At a minimum, interrupting the active shooter will slow the rate of killing and allow time for responders to arrive. In the best case, the death clock will be stopped.

Let's heed the example of the New Life Church in Arvada, Colorado, which, when threatened, called for volunteers from among its congregation to help guard its flock. Church member Jeanne Assam, a CCW holder, answered the call and later answered the challenge when a deranged visitor opened fire. Ms. Assam stopped the death clock and is credited with saving countless lives.

Let's learn the costly lessons of Killeen spread over two decades, where now the spirits of 36 unnecessarily lost lives speak to us, asking that we quit playing political games with so-called gun control and start treating the lives of our friends and neighbors as extraordinarily valuable, not to be wasted by leaders who are more afraid of the people they lead than the people they fight.

RELATED LINKS: Female Church Member with Personal Pistol Kills Assassing, Saves Lives
Ten Years Later, It's True: After Guns Have Been Outlawed, Only Outlaws Have Guns
Terrorists in America Switching to "Plan B"?
Is Virginia Tech Education's "9/11"?
Texas Learns 9/11 Lesson From Virginia Tech

Let's arm our military… or at the very least let's arm our women.

Continued......

Monday, November 09, 2009

Obama Decides Bipartisanship is Unacceptable

In the 2,000 page health care monstrosity passed late Saturday night by the House of Representatives, only one section mustered bipartisan support. The Stupak amendment passed the House with a truly bipartisan, strong majority vote.

Unfortunately for those who believe still in democracy, President Obama has just announced that "because there are strong feelings on both sides," the bill needs more work.

Is this the way they do it in Chicago? Do strong feelings of the minority trump the bipartisan votes of the majority?

If so, perhaps we can get a "do-over" on the major bill, which passed on a nearly perfect party-line vote with only one-twentieth the margin of the Stupak amendment, over the "strong feelings" held by opponents of politicized health care?

Or, does the strength of the "strong feelings" argument depend on who's doing the feeling

Continued......

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Mr. Obama's Moving Comments on Fallen at Ft. Hood

The man can talk…



But, at the end of the day, it's all about him.


A word here, a word there, and pretty soon a word is worth even less than the dollar.

Continued......